By Paul Carrier
With only one other David Sedaris book under my belt (the
hilarious Holidays on Ice), I may not be in the best position to
judge Let’s Explore Diabetes with Owls, a collection of monologues and essays, many of which have previously appeared in The New
Yorker and other publications.
That being said, I didn’t enjoy
this compilation as much, not because it lacks Sedaris’ delightfully offbeat sense of humor (there's some laugh-out-loud stuff here) but because this is an
uneven assemblage. The hits here share space with a few near
misses.
Sedaris is known for writing ostensibly autobiographical
essays about his life, including his childhood in North Carolina; his time abroad in England, France, and elsewhere; his relationship with partner Hugh
Hamrick; and his dyspeptic take on the antics of the boorish and baffling
people he encounters in his travels.
In fact, Sedaris is at his
best when he turns a jaundiced eye and a sardonic pen on folks who
strike him as ill-mannered cretins. He is a peevish — some might say
petty — fellow, but that’s part of his appeal. Many readers are sure to
share his take on the irritants that bedevil modern life, such as the
slovenly dress code that has become the norm for traveling Americans.
“I
should be used to the way Americans dress when traveling,” Sedaris
writes, “yet it still manages to amaze me. It’s as if the person next to
you had been washing shoe polish off a pig, then suddenly threw down
his sponge saying, ‘Fuck this. I’m going to Los Angeles!’”
Sedaris
doesn’t confine his biting assessments to his fellow Americans. He describes rural Britons as slobs who dump an obscene amount of
litter along scenic roadways and in adjacent forests. He finds China to be
a land plagued by truly horrendous, and avoidable, sanitation problems. As for Italy,
Sedaris laments that the language barrier there had unfortunate consequences when he bought a train ticket to Brindisi.
“The man behind the counter
offered me three options, and I guess I said yes to the one that meant
“No seat for me, thank you. I would like to be packed as tightly as
possible alongside people with no access to soap or running water.’”
Part
of Sedaris’ appeal is his knack for finding links among disparate
events and ruminations, which he packages so tidily that readers may find
themselves wondering, in the end, how they got from A to Z in
the course of a single essay. He also conjures up poignant images from
time to time, most notably as a son who, even in adulthood,
continues to crave the love of a less-than-supportive father.
Still,
13 pages devoted to Sedaris’ one-man anti-litter campaign in West Sussex, a
county in the south of England, is at least a few pages too many.
Another essay, on Sedaris’ growing frustration while stuck in line
behind a boringly chatty customer at a coffee bar in a New Hampshire
hotel, is shorter, but only mildly entertaining.
Yet Sedaris packs so
much variety into Let’s Explore Diabetes with Owls that reading it is something like catching a talented stand-up comedian at work.
Some jokes may fall flat, but the audience doesn’t obsess over them
because the guy on stage is sharp enough to quickly recover his footing with
a better gag or a funnier anecdote.
Sedaris tosses
in several entertaining and thought-provoking monologues that make no claim to being factual. In
one such fictional tale, a homophonic man becomes so unglued when same-sex
marriage is legalized in New York that he decides the world has
completely gone to hell, so the rules governing acceptable
behavior no longer apply to him or anyone else.
The narrator then murders his wife, his daughter and his
mother-in-law, none of whom he liked all that much anyway. For good
measure, he zips past a stopped school bus while it's unloading students, accidentally killing a kid — “most likely a
gay one” — who was crossing the street. Figuring he’ll be released from
prison if the powers that be believe he's gay, he kisses his cell mate and concludes that "it's really not that bad," if you keep your eyes closed.
Over-the-top? Certainly. But how better to skewer senseless hatred and all-consuming phobias?
